Today I’m looking at product inconsistencies. Specifically, how does a product differ from batch to batch? This might be a crazy thing to some people, but I do own multiples of the same makeup item because I like to have back-ups or have more than one to use at the same time (as in the case with makeup brushes). Here are some things that I’ve found to be inconsistent:
MAC eye shadow in Satin Taupe
This is my absolute favourite MAC eye shadow. Last year I got it in my head that MAC would mess with me and discontinue it so I went and bought a back-up.
When I got it home, I decided to put them side by side to compare them and was aghast when I noticed they were not the same! The original one has a stronger pigmentation with more complex shimmer, whereas the new one is kind of boring – lacking in multi dimensional shimmer. It was difficult to capture on camera, but the new one is slightly cooler toned and not as shimmery.
Granted, I purchased the back-up at least 8 years after the old one – and exposure to air, oils, and other eye shadows could have altered it. But I prefer the old one more than the new one! I’m hoping maybe in 8 years’ time the “new” one will be the same as the original if I leave it to “age”? 😕
Wet n Wild Color Icon in Nutty
This one is a puzzling one. I had read so many raves for Nutty online so I had to buy it. I was quite let down by how it looks on my lids – just a light silvery sorta sandy shade that leaves a lot to be desired. I shoved it to the back of my eye shadow drawer and forgot about it (I did take the time to depot it though).
Then several years later, I decided to give it another chance and since it was so cheap ($1) so I decided to buy another Nutty and to my surprise, the 2nd version is much more pigmented. It is also more similar to MAC Satin Taupe as claimed by so many online reviews. Now I understand the hype – but no, I still do not think it’s a dupe for MAC Satin Taupe.
Since I mentioned in my MAC Extra Dimension post that I have 2 of the same shade, I thought I’d include it here as well. One I purchased in 2012 as a single, and the other I received in a kit in 2014 as a duo – they’re both the same formula and named the same.
Honestly, they’re very close – even more so to the naked eye. I am just being nitpicky in saying that I think the 2014 version is slightly cooler toned. But overall, I’m not going to cry about it considering I didn’t even realize I bought a shade I already owned – oops.
And since I’ve got 3 taupe eye shadows in front of me, why not compare them against one another:
As you can see, the Wet n Wild Putty is not a dupe for MAC Satin Taupe – it’s too ashy. Next up, a couple of brushes:
Sonia Kashuk Synthetic Crease Brush #8
I distinctly remember buying the original one of this brush back in 2009 when I went cross-boarder shopping in Buffalo. Back then, there were no Target stores in Canada (well, we’re back to square one now, because we no longer have Target stores again in Canada!) I loved the density and shape of this brush so much that when Target Canada opened, I decided to buy another one in 2013 to use in my brush rotation.
I was sorely disappointed when I compared them side by side and the new version is not nearly as dense, and it’s too fluffy compared to the 2009 version. I’m glad I bought the original.
And lastly, this one is in NO way, shape or form a slight against Shu Uemura, but I will title this as: that time when stashmatters possibly bought a fake off eBay without realizing. *gasp!* 😮
Shu Uemura Natural Brush 10
I bought my original one from the Shu Uemura counter in Holt Renfrew so I know it’s legit. It also cost something like $85. A few years later, I spotted an Australian eBay shop claiming that they were clearing out their Shu Uemura inventory so everything must go! At crazy discounted prices – I paid $20 for the #10 brush. The reviews of this seller were fantastic and she made it clear that she does NOT sell fakes and guarantees authenticity of her products. But here’s the thing, the fake is SO damn good I almost didn’t notice. I received the brush, proceeded to wash it and use it. It feels and performs exactly the same as the original! The hairs, the handle, the ferrule, the slightly raised lettering – all look and feel very high quality. Only when I put it side by side with my original Shu, did I notice the slight differences. Can you spot the differences?
I’m not going to tell you which one is which, please guess in the comments which one you think is the real deal, A or B. I’ve owned both for years and they both wash up wonderfully – I use them interchangeably. Part of me wants to believe that they’re both authentic, and that Shu Uemura changed the brush slightly? Or are there regional differences between the Australian vs North American stock? 😛
Have you noticed inconsistencies in your makeup products? Did they change the formula of your favourite item?